Am Dienstag 15 Mai 2018 10:29:45 schrieb Andrew Gallagher: > I’m not saying that active elements should be banned outright, just that > they should be handled more carefully in the encrypted case than they are > in plaintext.
> so we may want to suppress the handy “load images” button or have > a separate config setting for “display remote content in encrypted messages > by default”. The point being that the context determines the measures that > we may want to take. I agree. My point is that it is legitimate to send files with potentially active contents. And they are a problem even outside of an email application. So making integrity checks a hard requirement and do not display anything in the failed case seems a good idea to me. Bernhard -- www.intevation.de/~bernhard +49 541 33 508 3-3 Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998 Geschäftsführer Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
