Stefan Claas wrote: > MFPA wrote: > > [...] > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > iQ8RBAEWCg65FiEElgyGKNWS/4zei7C/4OLe4dbI7voFAl692adfFIAAAAAALgAo > [...] > > > RjfdBwsdZJrUrgtu7YTLAf0/v9mZZBAXfvO8CgNySZfWWZ5IP0BvHLgkUXI0r7Qt > > kuQMuu7LJiMJFrPQKIL1cQ== > > =XcGg > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Hi, > > out of curiosity, you signed the reply with two sub keys, but > what makes the signature so large, the hash algo used? I must > admit I have never seen such a large signature before. > > And slightly OT, when not counting the two last short lines > in the signature, 378 NaClbox public keys would fit in in > the signature! :-)
Correction, a NaClbox key is 32 bytes but in an ASCII representation 64 ASCII chars long in the key ring, so it would 'only' be 189 public keys. Regards Stefan -- Signal (Desktop) +4915172173279 https://keybase.io/stefan_claas _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
