On 12/01/2021 20:40, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 8:17 PM André Colomb <an...@colomb.de> wrote: >> >> Hi Stefan, > >> So there are two "bugs" involved here. 1. GitHub presenting an invalid >> certificate for the sub-subdomain and 2. Sequoia not noticing that. >> Neither of these are bugs in GnuPG. If you can accept these facts, then >> it makes sense to further discuss what could be changed where to make >> your desired setup work. Maybe that discussion will lead to a concise >> change proposal. > > Hi Andre, currently I can only accept the fact that these two "bugs" are > currently not resolved in GnuPG and gpg4win, if you allow me to > formulate it this way.
How can GPG solve bugs that are not in the GPG code or infrastructure? I think André did a great job explaining what the issues are. How do you think they can be addressed by GPG? Cheers, Dan _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users