On Tue 2024-08-06 14:01:36 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Or, if you really want the "sop verify" and "sop inline-verify"
> interface to support some sensible "at least N signatures" semantic, feel
> free to open a suggestion in the sop issue tracker:
>
>   https://gitlab.com/dkg/openpgp-stateless-cli/-/issues/new

I've gone ahead and opened an issue to keep track of this, because this
isn't the first time this question has come up about more sophisticated
OpenPGP signature verification for sop:

    https://gitlab.com/dkg/openpgp-stateless-cli/-/issues/104

I'd love to hear feedback there from implementers and from operators of
infrastructure that depend on signature verification.

        --dkg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to