Am 08.05.25 09:55 schrieb(en) Werner Koch:
> Apparently Thunderbird (and maybe other MUA's, too?) *is* able to deal > with this signature, including a warning if the message has been > tampered with, whilst any application using the gpgsm through gpgme or > directly isn't which of course is a pity.But there is no signature. It is a proper certs-only message which as far as I remeber is weel defined by CMS. gpgsm simply didn't showed the message because you gave a data file. I improved that diagnostic meanwhile.
Well, all I can tell from the dumb user's perspective is that Thunderbird *does* actually report a valid signature (see attached combined screenshot): The dialogue for a message signed with my personal business certificate (left) looks similar to the “strange” one (right). Gpgsm (through gpgme) is able to process the former, but not the latter. Thanks, Albrecht.
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
