I have the feeling that attacks against PGP/GNUPG are being launched based on alleged weaknesses that are later proven not to exist. I see people recommending against using it based on these assumptions.
I've been involved in the PGP community since 1991. You are absolutely correct in what you're describing, but it's been this way for at least thirty-five years. It will likely always be this way.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
