On 7 May 2026, at 15:19, Werner Koch <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 7 May 2026 14:13, Andrew Gallagher said: > >> That’s fair when you are taking a once-proprietary protocol and > > Actually, it was never proprietary. PRZ feared that by a future > acquisation the new owner could close the source code and thus limit > good privicay for evertone. This is why he wanted to have an open > specification
I used “proprietary” in the sense of “controlled by a single person/org”, so we are in agreement here. Proprietary as in .docx, not as in Coke; if you will. A _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
