Hey, Tim Spriggs wrote: > Martin Man wrote: >> Erast Benson wrote: >> >>>> >>> I'd say, it would make sense to make ON compilable on Nexenta first, >>> workout issues and come up with diff first. And after that I will try to >>> find some time to put everything together as a buildable sunw source >>> package. Currently those scripts are very much SXCR specific and needs >>> to be fixed to work properly in native env too. >>> >> >> My initial testing reveals that the patch to build ON on Nexenta must >> address usage of sed/awk/echo, these are fine and just one-liners in >> multiple locations. What is however not that easy are build-depends for >> certain ON parts. I have identified the evil to be net-snmp, glib, dbus, >> all of them have headers conveying info how they were compiled, so using >> nexenta versions of these packages is not easy yet, I'm trying to use >> SXCE versions now. The same applies for GNU as. I hope to put the >> summary to my blog as soon as I have a full build. At the moment around >> 30 components are still failing to build due to various issues. >> >> Which means, that it might make sense to publish the ON->dpkg scripts as >> soon as possible and simply using SXCE zone to build ON for now... >> >> what do you think? >> Martin >> > > I know it's not open source but what about using SUNWspro compilers > instead of GNU? They are decent IMHO.
The ON actually must be compiled using SUNWspro, it does shadow compilation using gcc, but AFAICS the gcc-only build is not finished/supported yet (if ever)... correct me if I'm missing something > -Tim HTH, Martin _______________________________________________ gnusol-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-devel
