I have found a work-around for the x4100 if an admin is willing to match the other NICs settings instead of using preferred settings. I don't have any other critical bugs to note.
Thanks, -Tim Erast Benson wrote: > Thanks for the information! > By any chance, do you have bug number for this? Could you look it up if > fix is already in? > > On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 13:52 -0700, Tim Spriggs wrote: > >> Hi Erast, >> >> There is a new bug in the e1000g driver that does not allow flow >> control to be advertised correctly. This means that link aggregates on >> the x4100 don't work where there are two nge interfaces and two e1000g >> interfaces. This seems to affect the latest Sol10U4 patches and the >> latest Nexenta testing base. >> >> -Tim >> >> Erast Benson wrote: >> >>> Guys, >>> >>> I just uploaded 1.0.1-test3 for your testing pleasure. >>> Please give it a try - if we will not find much of show stoppers in this >>> one, we will move it to stable - probably by the end of this week. >>> >>> Few important fixes in this release: >>> >>> 1) libdlpi now works more reliably with recent name vanity putback >>> >>> 2) significantly improved speed of boot_archive creation - up to 5 times >>> faster now... on my test box it takes ~ 7 seconds to recreate archives >>> (comparing to 60 seconds before the change) >>> >>> 3) disabled broken UFS/manual partitioning related code in installer >>> >>> Link: http://www.nexenta.org/releases >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> gnusol-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-devel >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> gnusol-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-devel >> >> > > _______________________________________________ gnusol-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-devel
