On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Tim Spriggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Bartley wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 3:59 AM, Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> blastwave seems to have glibc OpenSolaris porting.
>>>
>>
>> >From what I can tell, all the blastwave stuff links against
>> /lib/libc.so.1, which would be sun's libc. Perhaps you are thinking of
>> glib (a GNOME library)? If not, if you could provide a link I would
>> appreciate it (I've found nothing on google so far).
>>
>
> According to http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/FAQ.html#s-1.1:
>
> The systems glibc is known to work on as of this release, and most probably
> in the future, are:
>
>        *-*-gnu                 GNU Hurd
>        i[3456]86-*-linux-gnu   Linux-2.x on Intel
>        m68k-*-linux-gnu        Linux-2.x on Motorola 680x0
>        alpha*-*-linux-gnu      Linux-2.x on DEC Alpha
>        powerpc-*-linux-gnu     Linux and MkLinux on PowerPC systems
>        powerpc64-*-linux-gnu   Linux-2.4+ on 64-bit PowerPC systems
>        sparc-*-linux-gnu       Linux-2.x on SPARC
>        sparc64-*-linux-gnu     Linux-2.x on UltraSPARC
>        arm-*-none              ARM standalone systems
>        arm-*-linux             Linux-2.x on ARM
>        arm-*-linuxaout         Linux-2.x on ARM using a.out binaries
>        mips*-*-linux-gnu       Linux-2.x on MIPS
>        ia64-*-linux-gnu        Linux-2.x on ia64
>        s390-*-linux-gnu        Linux-2.x on IBM S/390
>        s390x-*-linux-gnu       Linux-2.x on IBM S/390 64-bit
>        cris-*-linux-gnu        Linux-2.4+ on CRIS
>
>
>
> I think glibc is very Linux specific, sometimes even down to the kernel
> version and porting to Solaris would be a very non-trivial task, it's
> probably better to tweak (correct) your source to run with Sun's libc and
> send the patch upstream if possible.

glibc has also been ported to freebsd[0][1]. Neither freebsd nor hurd
are similar to linux (aside from being posix compliant), so I don't
agree that glibc is linux-specific.

I know that Nexenta wanted to be an official Debian port at one time,
and that most of the opposition was a result of linking GPL code to
the CDDL-licensed sun libc. Getting glibc ported to solaris would be
the first-step in getting an official Debian port based on
OpenSolaris.

-- David

[0] http://www.nongnu.org/glibc-bsd/
[1] http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu/
_______________________________________________
gnusol-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-devel

Reply via email to