BTW, 9300 packages imported now. 3700 missing...
On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 10:27 -0500, Tim Spriggs wrote:
> I think we need to wait and see what happens when main is enabled for
> builds before we can judge what will happen ultimately with depends.
Right. This make sense to fix prior to addressing the rest of it.
> I
> don't think having packages with unmet depends in the unstable
> repository is a bad thing. I think in the worst scenario we can simply
> migrate known good packages to testing/stable and leave unmet packages
> in unstable. Having the packages there helps to get people involved: if
> they want to use the package they can help satisfy a few depends.
+1
I generally agree with this statement. I forgot that "testing" is not
yet propagated, so we can use this... Good idea.
I wonder if we could utilize apt-get's ordering simulation, i.e. to
verify if package A is "good" do this in a script:
if apt-get install -s A; then
echo "A: good"
upload hardy-testing A
else
echo "A: bad ..."
fi
_______________________________________________
gnusol-devel mailing list
gnusol-devel@lists.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-devel
