+1. we should try to stay as close to our upstream (Ubuntu) as possible and try not to introduce any unnecessary differences.
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 23:51 -0500, Tim Spriggs wrote: > Jason Upton wrote: > > So I have been looking through the almost 15k lines of diffs from the > > elatte package for pciutils trying to get the latest Ubuntu version > > ready (which is based on 2.2.4 version). I have resolved all of the > > diffs except one by noticing that many files were updated to 2.2.0 > > even though the orig/changelog was left at 2.1.11. > > > > There is one diff that is bugging me though - for some reason, the > > lspci and setpci commands are placed in "/usr/sbin" in the elatte > > package but both Debian and Ubuntu upstream has them in "/usr/bin". I > > checked my local Debian box to make sure and it has them in > > "/usr/bin". > > > > Is there a reason to move these commands (lspci and setpci) that is > > Nexenta specific? There are capabilities that do not require root, so > > it makes more sense to me to leave them in "/usr/bin" instead of > > "/usr/sbin". > > > > Thanks for any insight/comments/etc, > > Jason > > > Hey Jason, > > I vote to follow the /usr/bin scheme unless it conflicts with other > commands somehow. Even if it does, I think the package should divert > those other commands instead of moving things to sbin. I haven't looked > at it though so I may be missing an important detail... > > Thanks, > -Tim > _______________________________________________ > gnusol-devel mailing list > gnusol-devel@lists.sonic.net > http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-devel > _______________________________________________ gnusol-devel mailing list gnusol-devel@lists.sonic.net http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-devel
