> > > From the point of view of a developer using GNUstep (rather than someone > > > maintaining/writing the gnustep core) the correct behavior of bundles is > > > something that should just be assumed. In other words, I don't think this > > > is an issue that Gregory should need to consider in his design, rather > > > it's > > > an issue that we need to resolve in make/base so that he and others like > > > him can work productively. > > > > ... but I still think that assuming advanced building features in "core" > > components is not a good idea. Gorm is a "core" component and it would be > > nice if it was very portable and worked almost automatically as soon as > > the very basic stuff is ported to a platform. > > Support for weak symbols are hardly advanced, they have been a feature of ELF > since it's creation. As I pointed out before, it's Window's use of the rather > ancient COFF standard which is the real problem.
Well ... I personally think support for weak symbols is quite advanced :-) Anyway, I'm happy you read my suggestions and are thinking about it. :-) Thanks _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
