On Jul 6, 2005, at 4:16 AM, Riccardo wrote:
Part of this criteria would, of course, be which OSes are considered
important
enough to consistitute a "showstopper" which will require a fix prior
to
release.
Ok, I see we agree here.
I would propose to put GNU/Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD in the "main OS's"
we should never break before a release. Then a second class of OS's
where I would put Solaris and OpenBSD where we should try to be as
usable as possible but have at least -base working for a release.
I think we should have a some release criteria like this. However,
realistically, for the next release, either I'm going to disappoint a
bunch of people or the release will have to be pushed out another 3-4
weeks at least (likely as not, I'd be the one trying to fix all these
bugs on machines I don't even own).
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
