On Mer 26 octobre 2005 17:45, Adam Fedor wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Fabien VALLON >> >> For the 1.0 release, what do you think about an >> "OpenStep-compliant release" ? >> >> - This is the first goal of GNUstep. >> - There is already some bugs to fix for "OpenStep-compliants" classes. >> - There is already documentation for "OpenStep-compliants" classes. >> > > Well, it's a bit boring. People will say, 'hey, you've caught up with > 1999'. Anyway, we're pretty much OpenStep > compliant except for some trivial methods.
Good, you can release 1.0 now ( "OpenStep-compliant" ;-) Before that I think developers should : * Check if all OpenStep methods/classes are implemented and if not, implement them or add it in documentation ( ex: in http://gnustep.org/resources/documentation/Developer/Gui/General/OpenStepCompliance.html Nothing about NSBTreeBlock and some others ( removed because they are no longer part of OpenStep standard ) ) * Check if STRICT_OPENSTEP preproc condition is used everywhere ( when required ) * IMO autogsdoc should clearly mark methods "supported" for 1.0 (OpenStep-compliance) ( with a different color for html output for example ) * Fix some classes in -gui : NSColorPanel / Printing / NSWorkspace / Events loop troubles and Window Manager "integration" .... * Check if all methods for 1.0 are fully documented * Choose a default backend (?) * Maybye add a test suite for the 1.0 * Test 1.0 in predifined OS target ( Linux / *BSD for example ) and backend ( XFree86 / X.org ) Then release a Release condidate and find packagers ( marketing ;) Cheers Fabien _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
