--- Richard Frith-Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip>
> If we want to put the functionality into an existing > daemon, I think > gpbs would be the best option, as it is part of the > gui/back > libraries (ie related to applications) while gdnc > provides a service > for the base library. > > However, if we want to provide a reference > implementation that > developers of workspace managers can look at, I > think a standalone > process would be better than attaching the > functionality to an > existing daemon... fwiw i sent such a daemon a while ago... http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnustep/2003-05/msg00269.html thread continues here... http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnustep/2003-06/msg00030.html > and if we don't want to do that, > my preference > would be not to bother at all ... just use an > on-disk database of > the information we need, and modify GWorkspace as > our standard > workspace manager. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
