Hi!
Am 27.08.2006 um 23:56 schrieb Chris Vetter:
However, the above has some merit -- why not 'split' GNUstep in two
_official_ parts (and I think that is what Greg had in mind)
a) GNUstep Core -- the development framework, as it is right now
b) GNUstep Desktop -- well, the desktop itself.
I think that's a good idea. I'd prefer 'GNUstep Frameworks' for the
name of the development framework, though. It makes clearer what it
is. ('GNUstep Core' could also be the name of the GNUstep Base Library.)
For cooperation with Etoile and inclusion of existing applications,
it would be helpful if the license requirements allowed to include
code which is not GPL-licensed.
Another advantage, as already pointed out by Greg, would be
_coordination_ which currently IS missing with the development of
Etoile and GWorkspace (sorry to say that). Not to mention the ones
that never meet the light of day err are released into the public
due to lack of man-power...
True. It definitely lacks. I vote for it. :-)
-Günther
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
