On Sep 13, 2006, at 24:19, Yavor Doganov wrote:
And as a surplus we also would get some more apps for GNUstep
(even if some of those would be commercial ones).
Free commercial apps are welcome, but not proprietary ones.
Obviously this is non-sense. If proprietary apps wouldn't be welcome,
GNUstep would be GPL, not LGPL. GNUstep is LGPL to explicitly allow
for that.
It will be a contribution equal to zero (even a negative number) if
someone ports a non-free app for GNUstep.
Again utter non-sense. Its quite an excellent contribution for plenty
of reasons (not only the app itself, but also in the related
framework improvements) until it gets possibly replaced by a free
application.
Helge
--
Helge Hess
http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
