Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb: > As far as I know, the garbage collecting classes in the base additions > library are used only in gdl2. > It would seem to make sense to move themover into gdl2 rather than the > base additions library. > What do you think?
Personally I had hoped to remove the use of them in GDL2, but it was never a high priority. In fact I don't even really know if they actually fix the retain cycle issue that they are intended to solve in our EOModels. I never wrote any tests as most GDL2 applications wouldn't even notice the difference as they don't add / remove models. The main application I would worry about here is GDL2's DBModeler. It would be great if "we" (read Matt ;-) ) can work out a way not to need them at all. Personally I wouldn't mind of they were moved into GDL2 in the meantime as long as GDL2 didn't make them public. Alternatively we could create a 'BaseUtilities' NATIVE_LIBRARY project and have GDL2 depend on that in the meantime. Then people who currently may still be using these classes have a migration option. Cheers, David _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
