Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
> I didn't realise this was used outside the base library.
>
> I've no strong objection to putting it back, but I do want to
> minimise/remove non-standard APIs (just declaring them private is not
> good enough).
>
> Would it really be a great hardship to just use the numeric values of
> the string encodings?
> I don't know the current state of GDL2 ... I guess if you dislike
> using a number there is no gui tool for manipulating models and you
> edit plists by hand?
I use EOModeler on a Mac.
index.eomodeld:
{
EOModelVersion = "2.1";
adaptorName = PostgreSQL;
connectionDictionary = {databaseName = XXXX; hostName = XXXX;
databaseEncoding = NSUTF8StringEncoding; };
entities = ( .......
Sure, I use the inspector to insert "NSUTF8StringEncoding" there. But it is
possible that in some version
of OSX or GNUstep the (internal) number is changed. Also, NSUTF8StringEncoding
is better readable
that a numeric value, which you would have to look up.
Is that a good reason?
Dave
--
_ _
_(_)(_)_ David Wetzel, Turbocat's Development,
(_) __ (_) Buchhorster Strasse 23, D-16567 Muehlenbeck/Berlin, FRG,
_/ \_ Fax +49 33056 82835 Phone +49 33056 82834
(______) http://www.turbocat.de/
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
