Hmmm..
On 18.12.2006, at 02:57, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
And NeXT clearly failed with this strategy ;-)
To go into all of the reasons why NeXT failed is beyond the scope of
this email. But, suffice it to say, it wasn't this strategy that
failed them,
it was the idea that you could charge $10,000.00 per machine and
$5,000
per development seat and be profitable. :)
You misunderstood me ;-)
I was saying that NeXT failed with the OpenStep strategy! This never
really took off, especially after SUN dropped their OPENSTEP effort.
NeXT was successful with the NEXTSTEP 3.x OS (or OPENSTEP Mach 4.x
that is) and WebObjects/EOF.
-Phil
--
Philippe C.D. Robert
http://www.nice.ch/~phip
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
