Andrew Pinski <pinskia <at> gmail.com> writes: > On 3/21/07, Xavier Glattard <xavier.glattard <at> online.fr> wrote: > > Do you mean i would get the same error with a static gnustep-libobjc ? > Yes. > > > Should I build gcc-libobjc as a dll ? > libobjc should be built as a dll, now how to fix this is a different story. > > Since I don't have much expence in building .dll, you might want to > fittle with the .def file, and then fix the other part of the makefile > to always build it, libtool way of building a .dll might be the way to > go. > > Thanks, > Andrew Pinski > libobjc maintainer :)
I don't have *any* experience in building dll ;-) And building gcc-libobjc as a dll might break some other thing... So i give up and let this task to others, even if i could not use 'native exceptions'. Why the hell should libobjc be build as a dll ???? ;-) Thanks ! Xavier _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
