Well, what I was trying to get to with my previous e-mail was that we should only have 1 release, released more often, at a time, exactly to reduce the amount work needed on each release (by everyone).
But this is fine too. :) Stefan On Nov 10, 2007 11:07 AM, Adam Fedor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 8, 2007, at 5:19 PM, Stefan Bidigaray wrote: > > > On Nov 8, 2007 1:07 PM, Adam Fedor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On a related note. It appears that the gui release will rely on base > > >= 1.15.1 > > > > So what does that mean? Does gui 0.13.0 not work with base > > 1.14.1? (Just saw the new Library Compatibility page on the wiki, > > so yes) If that's the case, I don't think it's a good idea keeping > > things the way they are then. I generally make the Slackware > > packages that are on the FTP and what this current policy means to > > people packaging GNUstep is that they HAVE to follow GNUstep > > unstable no matter what since if you want to have a complete > > GNUstep environment you need base + gui. > > > I'll try to work on back-porting the gui changes to the 0.12 branch > so it's compatible with base 1.14. But it could be a week before > that happens. >
_______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
