On Nov 10, 2007 5:48 PM, Fred Kiefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Here you could help by testing and reporting the remaining problems.


I do, but for the past we weeks I haven't had my test computer up and
running, and before that I had a known compilation issue with cairo version
1.4.9 (I had Debian Etch installed), so I had to use arts.  Like I said
though, cairo is already really good and I consider it to be of beta
quality, and try to use it instead of the art backend whenever I can.

That being said, I also, sometimes, hesitate before filing bugs because I
want to make sure it's really a bug and not an issue with something I did
(you'd be amazed how ofter that happens).  Either way, I'm going to have to
reinstall Slackware sometime this week so that I can create packages for the
latest stable releases anyway (I'll install the SVN version after I have the
packages built).

Why this? What would be the benefit of this step from tiff to png?


TIFF is as good as dead at this point in time.  PNG is also a free (as in
freedom) standard, which is the main reason why I think GNUstep should
embrace it.  Also:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Network_Graphics#Comparison_with_TIFF

TIFF does have it's advantages, but the fact that almost no one uses it
makes it a pain... for example, I can't get images I make with
PhotoClip.appopen at work because Windows doesn't have TIFF support.
So I have to make
the TIFF with PhotoClip, then just to a terminal to convert it to PNG using
ImageMagick.  It's no big deal, but I'd still like to just save it as PNG.

The make it the standard image file part was just an after thought thrown in
there.

Stefan
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev

Reply via email to