On 2007-11-30 06:39:42 +0000 David Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Ayers schrieb:
But even if the define is set, I'm unsure that the runtime checks
will
lead to the expected results. Just because the method in NSObject
isn't
overriden by a subclass doesn't necessarily mean it expects the new
behavior. Most EO (and other KVC traversal) classes I deal with do
not
override the KVC primatives.
So I understand the intention but I don't think we are reaching the
result.
You may be right (I can't claim to be sure what happens in all
cases)... but I think this code is an improvement over the previous
version (which also tried to be backward compatible, but missed the
cases added by Marcus of course). My impression is that mostly the
new KVC behavior is compatible with the old behavior anyway, so what
needs looking at are any cases where it isn't.
Ideally we would update other frameworks to work with the newer API,
but where things haven't been updated, we want to maximisae backward
compatibility, and this is an improvement to that.
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
