Adam Fedor wrote: >> On Mar 3, 2008, at 9:28 AM, Hubert Chathi wrote: >>> >> I was intending on tracking the GNUstep unstable branch in Debian >> experimental, but we currently have some unresolved issues regarding >> ffcall/libffi.
> I think tracking unstable would be a good idea. OK, I will work on getting unstable in. > Are you having general problems with libffi/ffcall or on a particular > platform? Well, ffcall, as you know, doesn't work properly on SELinux, PAX, etc. I had a report of libffi not working on x86_64 (see one of my previous messages), and I don't have proper access to an x86_64 box to debug. So it seems like neither solution will work in general for all users. I'm working a solution to provide both versions in Debian, but it'll be a bit before I can implement it, due to lack of time. -- Hubert Chathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
