Very good point. :) Gregory Casamento -- Principal Consultant - OLC, Inc # GNUstep Chief Maintainer
________________________________ From: Nicola Pero <nicola.p...@meta-innovation.com> To: Gregory Casamento <greg.casame...@gmail.com> Cc: GNUstep Developer <gnustep-dev@gnu.org> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 6:03:39 AM Subject: Re: Updated Roadmap On 25 Mar 2009, at 20:37, Gregory Casamento wrote: > I've updated the 1.0 Roadmap here: > > http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Roadmap > > I'm throwing this out for discussion to find out where everyone thinks we > stand on some of these goals and what should be added/changed on this. I support you in your efforts to organize our roadmap ... but I would rather have roadmaps for the separate packages rather than a global "GNUstep 1.0" roadmap. ;-) Mostly because the simple idea of a yet-to-come "GNUstep 1.0" downplays the fact that the non-graphical part of GNUstep (which is at least half of core, ie gnustep-make and gnustep-base) reached 1.0 many years ago! And they are absolutely production-ready code. :-) Thanks _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
_______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
