Hans, The only thing I'm wondering is why "pear" in particular? I think it's good, because it's imaginative. Additionally, I wouldn't have wanted the tool to be called gsxcodebuild or gspbxbuild or even gsbuild as I have a distinct allergy to things being prefixed with GS simply because they can be. Part of this comes from having committed the sin myself in the form of my "gopen" tool. :) The only reason it's not "open" is because there is an open keyword/tool on most versions of Linux with which it would conflict. O_o
Also, it seems pbxbuild is the *previous* name of xcodebuild. So, it would be clearer when talking about pearbuild vs. pbxbuild vs. xcodebuild since it would be obvious you are referring to GNUstep's tool instead of a previous version of the build tool on OS X. GC On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Hans Baier <[email protected]> wrote: > I recently I had an idea for a new name of the tool: > > pearbuild. > > I really like it and it would even preserve the namespace prefixes. > > What do you think? > > Hans > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnustep-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev > -- Gregory Casamento Open Logic Corporation, Principal Consultant ## GNUstep Chief Maintainer yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa (240)274-9630 (Cell), (301)362-9640 (Home) _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
