В Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:58:20 +0100, David Chisnall написа: >> GNU ObjC >> has so few users that it seems hardly worth the effort to upgrade the >> GNU ObjC front end to ObjC 2.0. And there are other issues: > > Translation: The GNU project doesn't care about GNUstep.
Wrong. A plea for help has been at a prominent place on the homepage for quite some time; according to the CVS log: ,---- | revision 1.108 | date: 2006-10-21 00:06:11 +0300; author: yavor; | Added information about GNUstep, as discussed and approved by Adam | Fedor, RMS and John Sullivan. `---- Similarly, there is a "take action" item which is linked from literally every page on gnu.org: http://gnu.org/server/takeaction.html#gnustep GNUstep is also one of the few projects with directed donations: https://my.fsf.org/donate/directed-donations/gnustep.html On the technical front, Emacs.app has been merged into Emacs proper precisely because one of the main reasons was GNUstep support. Now, it's a separate question how much these things actually help. But in reality, the GNU project cannot impose to the GCC developers to work on Objective-C, just like it cannot order to you as a GNUstep developer to work on, say, the GNUstep Guile bindings. So the correct translation is: "Some of the GCC developers do not care much about GNUstep". Which is a very different thing. _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
