Hey Guys, It would make live a little easier to do this for a number of reasons:
1) It would alleviate explaining to new people what gui and base are... every time I talk about GNUstep I have to say "the gnustep equivalent of AppKit/Foundation, etc..." 2) It would eliminate confusion between CoreBase and the "base" which is in the "core" of GNUstep.... i.e. CoreFoundation vs. Foundation. :) 3) The original reason we did this was due to the fear of the Trademark police, but other projects which have attempted to implement Cocoa have used the names "Foundation" and "AppKit" without any problems. As it is with class names "NSObject" etc... so it is with the directory names. Indeed we even use Foundation and AppKit when they're installed... so there's no reason not to rename the directories under core to Foundation and AppKit (perhaps not with the capitalization... but that's debatable). Anyway... any thoughts? Thanks, GC -- Gregory Casamento - GNUstep Lead/Principal Consultant, OLC, Inc. yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa (240)274-9630 (Cell) _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
