On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Matt Rice <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller > <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't think this is the case, if you no longer have to pass the > nearest timer as a timeout for the polling mechanism, > and the timerfd can be used to identify the timer ahh, for some reason I ignored the pesky return value. _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
