I never tried building a static library, so I'd say use OpenTTD's.  As for
the second question, the answer is yes.

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Jose Mondefo <[email protected]>wrote:

>  Stefan, thanks for your clear explanation. The only this I don't fully
> understand is, if I need to build a static library (for boost library), do I
> have to use the OpenTTD patch, or can I use yours?
>
> One extra thing, as I read in a previous post, this patch works with the
> .zip icu file, and the OpenTTD was thinked to work with the tgz, I'm ok?
>
> By the way, thanks you and Richards for this great contribution!
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:26:55 -0600
> Subject: Re: GNUstep + libicu on Windows
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
>
>
> Sure, no problem.  The OpenTTD patch wasn't very generic, so I needed to
> change a few things.  First off, the OpenTTD patch is made to strictly
> create a static library, we needed a shared one.  Most of the changes I made
> were to make the patch more generic (setting LIBPREFIX=lib, etc).  As the
> the lib/dll thing, the way I understand it, the .lib file type is used for
> static libraries on Windows (same as .a on UNIX).
>
> Does that explain it?
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Jose Mondefo <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>  Hi Stefan and Richard,
>
> I was looking for compiling icu in mingw32 for another project (more
> precisely for compiling then boost for using in freeling project), and found
> your patch, and the original patch at openttld. I see that your patch is a
> kind of improvement over that (more complete), but I see that there are one
> difference in the mh-mingw I don't understand very well.
> More precisely in the opentld patch there are a rename of the SO from dll
> to lib mention something about not working if --disable-shared, and some
> extra differences about the stubnames, both of theme not applied in your
> patch. Could you explain me what this difference represent?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnustep-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev

Reply via email to