Not that I am against this patch, I just don't see the reason why we should apply it. Is the main intention to get the correct spelling or is it about the extra character :-)
On 15.05.2011 13:55, Banlu Kemiyatorn wrote: > Hi, I just resend this 2 patches and correct the mail subject as I > forgot to change it in the previous one, sorry for the dups. > > On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Banlu Kemiyatorn<[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, I was wondering why there are extra underscores between subview >> and superview Here are 2 patches to rename _sub_views to _subviews and >> _super_view to _superview >> I test a bit and loading old gorm and recreating one seem to work >> fine. Hope this patch will reduce global warming a bit in a long run. >> >> One thing, I simply remove NSView *_superview; in GSNibLoading.h in >> doubt but since I don't see it decode or encode anywhere so it should >> be okay? >> >> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Banlu Kemiyatorn<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> why it's _sub_views and not _subviews? _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
