On 22 Jul 2011, at 08:24, David Ayers wrote: >> That being said, it's trivial to cache the body of static responses (I >> would just use an instance of GSCache to store the body, and put that >> in the response) ... which gets you a reasonably fast result, but will >> still produce rather more cpu load than using apache would. > > I suppose you mean NSCache?
I meant GSCache (from the performance library) which predates NSCache. The NSCache API looks like it may have been modelled on GSCache, but GSCache still provides a bit more control over the rules about when an object gets removed from the cache. _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
