On 8 Dec 2011, at 18:53, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > Hi, > > David just pointed me to this thread, since I first suspected sth. completely > different could cause breaking the configure of -base. I also just > recognized, that configuring -base seems to be broken for me with clang-3.0. > I can live with that parameter, but the name makes me kind of scary, thinking > I might now miss a a feature that I had working before...
I've changed/expanded the warning message in the hope of making the issue clearer, and hopefully not scary. _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
