The code is now at svn+ssh://svn.gna.org/svn/gnustep/libs/gui/branches/ericwa-text
On 2012-01-19, at 11:43 AM, Eric Wasylishen wrote: > Oh, sorry - I don't think that patch displays text attachments. > > I continued work on that patch a bit; here is the latest version. It still > needs a lot of work before it's ready to be committed. This version has an > efficient loop for drawing runs of glyphs, but I may have introduced a bug > because the insertion point position seems wrong. Text attachments aren't > drawn yet, either. To fully make sense the patch should really accompany an > update of the backend font code to use real glyphs and respect the advances > given in GSShowGlyphsWithAdvances. > > I guess I should put this in a SVN branch rather than emailing patches > around… :-) > > <text9.diff> > > Eric > > On 2012-01-19, at 5:18 AM, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > >> I found the problem ;) >> >> Its Erics patch he sent to mitigate the problem of the squeezed fonts >> displaying (see the thread: fonts displaying strangely). >> Compiling -gui without that patch, then Vespucci shows me the images. >> >> So not sure whether this is a bug in -gui or swk, since I haven't seen any >> other problems in other applications yet. >> >> So now for the FOSDEM I have two options: >> * either have no images in Vespucci >> * or squeezed fonts in nearly any application >> >> Since the font problem shows up for me on the notebook I wanted to use for >> the FOSDEM. >> >> Preferably I'd like to have both, images in Vespucci, and non-squeezed fonts >> ;) >> >> cheers, >> Sebastian >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:13 CET, "Sebastian Reitenbach" >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Monday, January 16, 2012 16:50 CET, "Sebastian Reitenbach" >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Monday, January 16, 2012 16:02 CET, Fred Kiefer <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 15.01.2012 14:27, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: >>>>>> I use gnustep -base, -gui (linked against ImageMagick), -back (cairo) >>>>>> from svn. (not yet the latest changes that went in with regard to the >>>>>> images loading speedup). I use simplewebkit from svn, and Vespucci from >>>>>> GAP CVS. >>>>>> I'm on OpenBSD i386 -current, gcc-4.2.1 with gcc libobjc. >>>>>> Riccardo told me that it used to work for him in December, the last time >>>>>> I checked is loooong ago, but I remember it used to work for me too. >>>>> >>>>> Could you please provide a bit more details here? >>>> both swk and vespucci seem to compile fine, Also when I start Vespucci, >>>> and open a web page, there is no warning about problems with >>>> images. (threre is actually a lot output from swk, but nothing that looks >>>> serious) >>>> >>>>> Are you on a 64 bit >>>>> machine? Then the most likely reason for the problem is that SWK and >>>>> Vespucci have not been updated for the change in base. All variable that >>>>> may contain a value of NSNotFound should be changed to NSUInteger. >>>> >>>> I'm on OpenBSD i386 as stated above, so 32 Bit. I'd call it amd64 for >>>> x86_64 ;) >>> >>> I did some more tests, on the same machine: >>> >>> updated -base, -gui, -back from svn, yesterday afternoon. >>> -> no change >>> then tried with libobjc2 (previous tests all with libojc from gcc-4.2.1) >>> -> no change >>> then tried different backends (previously with cairo, then with xlib and >>> art backend) >>> -> no change >>> -> with the xlib backend (tested over ssh -Y like the others), the Vespucci >>> main window stayed empty, not even text shown, the other two backends at >>> least showed the text. >>> >>> If someone else has suggestions what could be my problem here, and what >>> else to test, please let me know. >>> >>> Sebastian >>> >>>> >>>> Sebastian >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hope this helps >>>>> Fred >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Discuss-gnustep mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Discuss-gnustep mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Discuss-gnustep mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
