On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 6:10 PM, David Chisnall <[email protected]> wrote:
> I do not wish to have extra parallel build systems maintained by other > people in the tree, because that has caused confusion in the past both > among packagers and among people building from source. I want to make life > easy for building packages, and CMake does this: it exports the > configurable options in a way that is easy to parse and package managers > already have a lot of infrastructure for dealing with CMake from packaging > KDE and other things that use it. > How about moving it to "unmaintained/" or "unsupported/" and leaving a README that documents them as such -- thus preventing people from confusing them for something that's actively supported? They may still be a neat way to bootstrap the system on some of the platforms while using a great runtime instead of a good runtime. Just throwing an idea. All the work on libobjc2 is, of course, already greatly appreciated. -- Ivan Vučica - [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
