On Sat, Apr 7, 2018, 10:49 Richard Frith-Macdonald <
> > On 7 Apr 2018, at 10:21, Ivan Vučica <i...@vucica.net> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 7, 2018, 09:50 David Chisnall <gnus...@theravensnest.org>
> > My current plan is to make the format support ASCII, UTF-8, UTF-16, and
> UTF-32, but only generate ASCII and UTF-16 in the compiler and then decide
> later if we want to support generating UTF-8 and UTF-32. I also won’t
> initialise the hash in the compiler initially, until we’ve decided a bit
> more what the hash should be.
> > Emojis don't fit UTF-16. Even if one dismisses CJK, ancient scripts etc,
> constant strings are not absolutely unlikely to contain emojis.
> > Not supporting UTF-8 for internal storage may be reasonable, but not
> supporting UTF-32 for strings that require it seems like a bug.
> Everything fits in UTF-16 (or UTF-8 for that matter). However it's true
> that many/most emojis don't fit in a *single* 16bit value and require two
> UTF-16 (or multiple 8bit UTF-8 values) to encode them.
> Since the NSString APIs assume a 16bit character width, that means an
> emoji will generally be treated as two characters as far as they are
> concerned, but that's not really a problem and current gnustep-base
> can/does work for emojis (for instance, sending UTF16 to mobile phones).
Acknowledged. I guess I never looked up the representation of characters
with codepoints >64k in UTF-16.
Thanks to both for clarification!
Gnustep-dev mailing list