> On 18 Oct 2019, at 09:36, Richard Frith-Macdonald > <rich...@frithmacdonald.me.uk> wrote:
> However, gnu-make (I'm not an expert, just reading the documentation) allows > double-colon rules, where you can huve multiple rules for a target each with > a separate recipe (as long as there are no single colon rules for the same > target). > So it might be possible to change this code to > > base.make:: Version > ./configure > > base.make:: config.status base.make.in > ./$< $@ > > However I don't know whether that would cause dependency issues (eg the first > rule creates a config.status, and then the second rule gets applied as well). That seemed to work in a few tests I did, so I comitted it ... would be good if someoen more knowledgable could check though. _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
