David, I wasn't aware that the FSF was looking into this, though it isn't surprising. It will apply. We should abide by whatever it says. I hope they come up with a reasonable policy.
Yours, GC On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 4:31 AM David Chisnall <[email protected]> wrote: > On 14 Jul 2026, at 22:48, Gregory Casamento <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Based on the discussion, I do not see sufficient consensus or > justification to replace our existing AI policy with a "No-AI" policy for > the GNUstep core libraries. Accordingly, the existing policy will remain in > effect. > > Most of the arguments have been covered in other places and it’s quite > surprising that most of the folks in this thread seem unfamiliar with them, > but I would add one thing: > > This week, EMACS paused ‘AI’ contributions because the GNU project is > expected to provide an explicit policy soon. I presume that policy will > apply to GNUstep as well. > > David > > -- Gregory Casamento GNUstep Lead Developer / Black Lotus, Principal Consultant http://www.gnustep.org - http://heronsperch.blogspot.com https://www.openhub.net/languages/objective_c
