I am not a lawyer, so if you want a real legal opinion, you should talk to a lawyer
My informal (not legal advice) opinion would be that if you are not distributing GNUstep then you don't have any requirements under the license. The GPL and LGPL are both distribution licenses - if you are just allowing people to use it remotely without distributing the code or the resulting software then there are no requirements to do anything. Adam On Feb 21, 2014, at 6:27 AM, Peter Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Madam or Sir, > > > I represent the group of developers, who are in charge of creating a > cloud-based product. The soft we intend to develop is considered to be > proprietary, and the potential business model based on revenue from end-user > per stream. > > > The name of the library we interested in is “gnustep”. > > > In fact, I would like to find out if the business model we are going to use > requires any special conditions of licensing; if it does, it would be great > to know from you the details. > > > I am looking forward to hear from you asap. > > > Best regards, > > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > Gnustep-webmasters mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-webmasters
_______________________________________________ Gnustep-webmasters mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-webmasters
