Merge request https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/1991 was reviewed by Alexander Sosedkin
-- Alexander Sosedkin started a new discussion on lib/global.c: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/1991#note_2643064777 > #endif > > + e = secure_getenv("GNUTLS_BUFFER_RECLAIM"); Can we have rather hide this runtime selection itself behind some compile feature/define? I'd rather not have this behaviour and the switching overhead in the normal builds. -- Alexander Sosedkin started a new discussion on .gitlab-ci.yml: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/1991#note_2643064797 > + KTLS: [0, 1] > + - GNUTLS_FORCE_FIPS_MODE: 0 > + TESTS_ENABLED_GROUPS: "GROUP-X25519-MLKEM768 > GROUP-SECP256R1-MLKEM768 GROUP-SECP384R1-MLKEM1024" hope that won't leak into job names or something :sweat_smile: otherwise might need a shorter value and a bit of indirection -- Alexander Sosedkin started a new discussion: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/1991#note_2643064806 > Pull in leancrypto from a COPR through build-images, rather than building it > from git checkout Could you please link to that change? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/1991 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com.
_______________________________________________ Gnutls-devel mailing list Gnutls-devel@lists.gnutls.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnutls-devel
