Daiki Ueno commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2075#note_3121292078 > if we do neither, is the performance hit significant? I don't think so; the nettle version provides comparable performance (or even outperforms) the CRYPTOGAMS version: ```console $ gnutls-cli --benchmark-ciphers [...] Checking MAC algorithms, payload size: 16384 SHA1 1.05 GB/sec SHA256 0.46 GB/sec SHA512 0.68 GB/sec $ GNUTLS_CPUID_OVERRIDE=0x1 gnutls-cli --benchmark-ciphers [...] Checking MAC algorithms, payload size: 16384 SHA1 2.06 GB/sec SHA256 1.93 GB/sec SHA512 0.58 GB/sec ``` We may even want to drop the CRYPTOGAMS derived assembly for hashes and macs in 4.0. I've added the topic at https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/wikis/Planning-for-4.0. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/2075#note_3121292078 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. Unsubscribe from this thread: https://gitlab.com/-/sent_notifications/3-3m68xbxzu9yw5gx5zy6xcpy07/unsubscribe | Manage all notifications: https://gitlab.com/-/profile/notifications | Help: https://gitlab.com/help
_______________________________________________ Gnutls-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnutls-devel
