Hello Nikos, Sorry for the long delay,
I don't know if it makes any sense to fix it but I doesn't need this functionality. It's just for reporting. If the documentation described this behavior for a long time maybe people have followed it and -1 is an expected value then the changes will not be so rough but maybe not :-) ... Thank you anyway Regards, Joe 2013/10/21 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <[email protected]>: > On 10/14/2013 11:23 AM, Jonathan Roudiere wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Help says that the gnutls_error_is_fatal() function returns -1 for >> unknown error value but code doesn't seem to do that. >> >> Is the code shouldn't be modified like in the following patch ? > > Helo Jonathan, > I am wondering that since this issue exists for several years, does it > make sense to fix it? Shouldn't we fix instead the documentation, or do > you need that functionality? > > regards, > Nikos > > _______________________________________________ Gnutls-help mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnutls-help
