On 02/11/2014 03:33 PM, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > NM> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Ted Zlatanov <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I didn't see that somehow build-aux/config.rpath got included in the >>> patch, which was already pretty long. Sorry about that. > > NM> There seems to be something wrong with the patch for documentation. > NM> There are duplicate sections (e.g. "Introduction to the library"), and > NM> it seems like it duplicates existing documention. Is that intentional? > > Ugh. I was editing the document and everything looked OK with `git > diff' but when I redirected it I caught some garbage in the patch. I'm > sorry about that, no idea what happened[1]. See attached. > Should I mention for each priority string (I only did for "NORMAL") if > it enables or disabled DHE?
Thanks. I've committed only part of it. I think mentioning the detailed mappings to ciphersuites or algorithms should be done in an appendix (or one can obtain the list in real-time by using gnutls-cli -l --priority NORMAL). I'd prefer not to have such mappings in the main documentation so that there is freedom to rearrange algorithms and orders, as new attacks are being found without being bound to strict documented behavior. regards, Nikos _______________________________________________ Gnutls-help mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnutls-help
