On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 18:28 +0200, Anton wrote: > Hi, > > I have already built nettle with secp192 and secp224 curves support. > It was wrong decision and I should consider secp192 and secp224 > curves as insecure?
I do not believe that the Fedora/RHEL decision not to include secp192 and secp224 was related to security. Given today's situation though supporting the 192 and 224 curves doesn't provide much of an advantage. regards, Nikos _______________________________________________ Gnutls-help mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnutls-help
