Daiki Ueno <[email protected]> writes: > On a slightly related note, we might also want to plan a new major > release (3.9 or 4.0) with backward incompatible changes, such as default > cipher selections.
What kind of backward incompatible API/ABI change are you thinking of? I think doing backwards incompatible changes that affect running code out there is often just a bad idea, so IMHO it would be nice to enumerate the API/ABI changes for consideration, and then run reverse builds of Debian/Fedora packages using GnuTLS to see what breaks. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnutls-help mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnutls-help
