Bitz did play against the Habs and he did pretty well. 

The last two games he has played he has used his body more effectively, played 
more physically, and I think this is a good thing. 

Because Ference and Wideman were out, there was plenty for Hunwick to do on 
defense, so that made room for Bitz. 

I want to see both Hunwick and Bitz playing. 

I admire Kobesew's grit but I'd rather see him rested and healthy for round 1. 
I hope they play Sobotka. 

To me it was dopey to be using Montador at forward and leaving Bitz out. But 
there is lots we don't see and having young players antsy in the press box 
seems to be a strategy that Julien employs just enough - he lets them sit a 
couple but then brings them back and gives them a chance to show how much they 
want it. 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lori Labadie" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected], [email protected] 
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 9:37:31 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: [GoBruins] Re: (Bergeron injured) Sobotka question.. 

Thanks. I found that info out tonight as well. 

Byron Bitz is a forward. Why isn't he replacing any of the injured????????? Did 
Boston forget that he's not a defenseman? 

Lori 

At 09:28 PM 4/10/2009, Gordon wrote: 


Kobasew had a "maintenance day" and Sobotka was called up in case Kobasew 
couldn't go. Kobasew could play, so Sobotka was in the press box. 

Lehtonen was called up to replace Bergeron, who will sit out the rest of the 
season. 

Bitz is OK, but Julien likes Hunwick, who can also play defence as well as 
forward. 

Julien said that he is considering resting some players and/or taking players 
out for injuries to heal. 








--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Go 
Bruins Mailing List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/go-bruins?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to