On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Stevan Harnad <har...@ecs.soton.ac.uk>wrote:
> For my part I will continue my narrow focus on the goal of getting OA > (sic) universally provided. It had been my (foolish) fancy that that was > GOAL's goal too! > > I am quite happy for the list members, guided by the moderator, to decide whether or not content mining should be in scope for this list. If they decide not, I'm happy - in conjunction with others - to explore a new list. It may be the best solution. And in any case I should applaud Stevan for having created the GOAL list and also decided to hand it over to RP when the time was right. In Open Source I have termed this the "Doctor Who model". ( http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/06/19/1326254/the-doctor-who-model-of-open-source) [...] > > PS For the terminologically tipsy: Unrestricted article content-mining, > like Google's book content-mining, would allow the extraction and > republication of "factual data" from journal articles by licensees, but it > would not provide unlicensed users with access to the full-text. > That is very clearly put and effectively exactly what I am asking for. I'm not quite sure what "terminology" has to do with it - I don't know a formal term for it - yet. > > > -- Peter Murray-Rust Reader in Molecular Informatics Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry University of Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK +44-1223-763069
_______________________________________________ GOAL mailing list GOAL@eprints.org http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
