I would like to offer listserv readers a clarification with regard to the Kuperburg-Harnad exchange - quoted below - which refers to the eprint archives sponsored by the University of California-based California Digital Library.
The California Digital Library hosts the "eScholarship" program to support scholar-led experiments and innovation in scholarly communication. (Readers are encouraged to browse escholarship.cdlib.org for more information.) Included in that support are eprint repositiories made available to specific scholarly communities who would like to use them as a primary means to disseminate scholarship or as an arena in which to experiment with other innovations such as peer-reviewed journals as "overlays" to the contents of a repository. Important characteristics of our efforts, some of which were misrepresented in the Kuperburg-Harnad exchange below, include: * CDL's eprint repositories are discipline-based, not institutional. To date participating disciplinary communities include Dermatology, International and Area Studies, and Tobacco Control Research. Readers will not be surprised to learn that these communities include leading UC faculty members who were responsible for bringing to our attention a community's readiness to experiment. * There is no administrative or Regent-level "mandate" that the University of California have archives or that its researchers use them. There is UC Presidential support for the eScholarship program and strong desire for UC to contribute to innovation in scholarly communication. The design of the eScholarship program has so far focused on researchers' affinities and affiliations with disciplinary communities rather than on institutional affiliation. We continue to have discussions with a number of scholarly societies about possible collaboration in the development of eprint repositories. * Our repositories are quite young, having opened in January 2001, and are still in a phase of community testing and feature development. * Community use of our repositories is scholar-led, usually through an editorial or advisory board of participating scholars, including many with no UC affiliation. Policy setting, including whether use is focused on self-archiving or with community-based filtering, or a combination, is up to the community. * We are quite pleased to have the eprints software from eprints.org available to underlie the initial versions of eScholarship repositories. We expect to work with Stevan's group on the further development of the software but also leave open the possibility that a different infrastructure may be needed to meet community needs. * We are also enthusiastic about the potential for the Open Archives Initiative and its metadata harvesting protocol to allow interoperabiltiy across our own and other eprint repositories. Note also that we believe OAI is likely to facilitate interoperation or federation of other scholarly materials and are contributing to discussions in the OAI community on this very topic. [ From Tue, 27 Mar 2001 exchange; Greg Kuperburg] >> First, at most universities there is no e-print archive. Certainly >> there isn't one at UC Davis. And if there were one, why should I >> believe that central campus computing would administer it competently? >> Central computing has a pretty low reputation on many campuses. I >> imagine that ours is not bad relatively speaking. But we've had our >> share of quarrels even over the most fundamental issues, like >> unintelligible balance sheets for grants and payroll. E-prints are a >> trivial and arcane topic compared to getting paid. > [Stevan Harnad] >Institution-based, OAI-compliant self-archiving is new. The OAI 1.0 >release of the eprints.org archive-creating software only took place on >January 23, to coincide with the release of OAI 1.0. There are well >over 100 sites who are trying out the software, and UC is not one, but >three of them. I don't know about Davis in particular; perhaps someone >from UC-Davis can reply. But I do know that it's being tested by UC at >the level of the California Digital Library ><http://www.escholarship.cdlib.org/eprints.html> because it was mandated >(by the Regents?) that UC must have Online Archives for its researchers >to self-archive in by 2001. -------------------------------------------------------------- John Ober, Director, Education and Strategic Innovation California Digital Library (www.cdlib.org) University of California [email protected] tel: (510) 987-0425 fax: (510) 893-5212 --------------------------------------------------------------
